| Audience | What They Care About | Communication Style |
|---|---|---|
| Executives | Outcomes, risks, metrics | 1-page summary, no jargon, bullet points |
| Engineers | Scope, clarity, dependencies | Detailed requirements, technical context |
| Designers | User problems, constraints, freedom | Problem statements, not solutions |
| Sales | Competitive positioning, timelines | Feature availability, objection handling |
| Support | Known issues, workarounds, ETAs | Troubleshooting guides, escalation paths |
Create prompts/roadmap-generator.md. The roadmap must be outcome-oriented, include quarterly goals, key results (measurable), dependencies, risk assessment, sprint allocation (12 sprints, 1 buffer), and sequencing rationale. Run it and apply the AI roadmap failure check before proceeding.
Create prompts/stakeholder-comms.md to generate three communications from the same roadmap:
Rules: do not promise unconfirmed dates, do not overcommit scope, be honest about risks, tailor language to each audience.
Resolve this conflict:
Engineering Lead: "Onboarding wizard scope is too large for Q3. We can do
the basic flow but progress tracking and contextual guidance need to wait."
Sales Lead: "We told Acme Corp the full wizard would be ready in August.
If we don't deliver the full experience, they'll evaluate WorkForge."
CEO: "I want this shipped in Q3. Full scope."
Work through: (A) map constraints โ what each stakeholder wants, why, what they fear, and their flexibility; (B) find the overlap; (C) identify false constraints; (D) propose a phased approach with Phase 1 (Q3) and Phase 2 (Q4) with committed timeline.
Write deliverables/W07-conflict-resolution.md with constraint mapping table, proposed solution with phasing, tradeoffs made, and the actual message you would send to each stakeholder.